Said v. Assaad
This text of 289 A.D.2d 931 (Said v. Assaad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment reversed on the law without costs, motion by defendants Western Products, Inc., a Division of Douglas Dynamics, Inc., and Douglas Dynamics, Inc. granted and new trial granted in accordance with the same Memorandum as in Said v Assaad ([appeal No. 3] 289 AD2d 924 [decided herewith]).
All concur except Hayes, J., who dissents and votes to vacate in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Said v Assaad ([appeal No. 3] 289 AD2d 924, 930 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J. — Damages.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 A.D.2d 931, 736 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/said-v-assaad-nyappdiv-2001.