Said v. Assaad

289 A.D.2d 931, 736 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12407
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Said v. Assaad. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 A.D.2d 924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 2001·No. Appeal No. 4·Published

Opinion

Order and judgment reversed on the law without costs, motion by defendants Western Products, Inc., a Division of Douglas Dynamics, Inc., and Douglas Dynamics, Inc. granted and new trial granted in accordance with the same Memorandum as in Said v Assaad ([appeal No. 3] 289 AD2d 924 [decided herewith]).

All concur except Hayes, J., who dissents and votes to vacate in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Said v Assaad ([appeal No. 3] 289 AD2d 924, 930 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J. — Damages.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Said v. Assaad, 289 A.D.2d 931, 736 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

289 A.D.2d 931 (Said v. Assaad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Said v. Assaad
289 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)