Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 2013·No. 05-13-00842-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 7, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00842-CR

SAHISHNU SHANMUGAM, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-83471-2012

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On September 11, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the clerk’s and reporter’s records have not been filed. We ADOPT the trial court’s findings that: (1) appellant, who filed a pro se notice of appeal, did not appear at the hearing regarding the record; (2) appellant was represented by retained counsel at trial and did not file an affidavit of indigence for the appeal, therefore, appellant is not indigent; (3) appellant has not paid for the clerk’s or reporter’s records; and (4) appellant has abandoned the appeal.

We will dispose of the appeal in due course.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State (Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.