Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 5, 2013.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00842-CR
SAHISHNU SHANMUGAM, Appellant V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 005-83471-2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown
Sahishnu Shanmugam was convicted of driving while intoxicated, second offense.
Punishment was assessed at 300 days’ confinement in jail, probated for eighteen months, and an
$800 fine. When the clerk’s and reporter’s records were not filed, we ordered the trial court to
conduct a hearing on the status of the records. We adopted the findings that appellant, who filed
a pro se notice of appeal, did not appear for the hearing, is not indigent, and has not paid for the
record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b)
(clerk’s record not filed due to appellant’s fault).
/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN
Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47
130842F.U05
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SAHISHNU SHANMUGAM, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Collin County, Texas No. 05-13-00842-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 005-83471-2012.
Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Moseley and Lang participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of prosecution.
Judgment entered this 5th day of November, 2013.
/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State (Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.