Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 11, 2013·No. 05-13-00842-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered September 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00842-CR

SAHISHNU SHANMUGAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-83471-2012

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the clerk’s and reporter’s records because of ineffective counsel, indigence,

or for any other reason.

• The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

• If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

• The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

• The trial court shall next determine the date by which the clerk’s record will be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State (Sahishnu Shanmugam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.