Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

Fourth Circuit

Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

111 F. App'x 687

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2004·No. No. 04-6989·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Corr. Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-03-595-WDQ (D.Md. May 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Corr. Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-03-595-WDQ (D.Md. May 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, 111 F. App'x 687 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

111 F. App'x 687 (Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related