Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

Fourth Circuit

Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

45 F. App'x 275

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2002·No. 02-6856·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-02-138 (D.Md. May 1, *276 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-02-138 (D.Md. May 1, *276 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, 45 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

45 F. App'x 275 (Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related