Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

Fourth Circuit

Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

68 F. App'x 527

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2003·No. 03-6793·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Malcom Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 *528 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-02-2543-1-AH (D. Md. filed Mar. 31, 2003 & entered Apr. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Malcom Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 *528 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-02-2543-1-AH (D. Md. filed Mar. 31, 2003 & entered Apr. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, 68 F. App'x 527 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

68 F. App'x 527 (Ryidu-X v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related