Rust v. Pratt
303 U.S. 621, 58 S. Ct. 648
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 28, 1938·No. No. 768; No. 769; No. 770; No. 771·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Per Curiam:
The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v. Best, 299 U. S. 1; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 106, 111-114; Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278, 285; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319.
Reported below: 157 Ore. 505; 72 P. 2d 533.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rust v. Pratt, 303 U.S. 621, 58 S. Ct. 648 (1938).
303 U.S. 621 (Rust v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Nicholson
383 P.3d 977 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
Barton v. Maxwell
933 P.2d 966 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Baker
868 P.2d 1368 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
City of Klamath Falls v. Bailey
602 P.2d 1107 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
State ex rel. Department of Revenue v. Parker
521 P.2d 38 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
Taylor v. Gladden
377 P.2d 14 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)