Home/Supreme Court/Rust v. Pratt

Rust v. Pratt

303 U.S. 621, 58 S. Ct. 648
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 28, 1938
DocketNo. 768; No. 769; No. 770; No. 771
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 303 U.S. 621 (Rust v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rust v. Pratt, 303 U.S. 621, 58 S. Ct. 648 (1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v. Best, 299 U. S. 1; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 106, 111-114; Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278, 285; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319.

Reported below: 157 Ore. 505; 72 P. 2d 533.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nicholson
383 P.3d 977 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
Barton v. Maxwell
933 P.2d 966 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Baker
868 P.2d 1368 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
City of Klamath Falls v. Bailey
602 P.2d 1107 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
State ex rel. Department of Revenue v. Parker
521 P.2d 38 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
Taylor v. Gladden
377 P.2d 14 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 U.S. 621, 58 S. Ct. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rust-v-pratt-scotus-1938.