Cox v. Colorado

Supreme Court

Cox v. Colorado

282 U.S. 807, 51 S. Ct. 103

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 8, 1930·No. No. 20·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per "Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Bailey [808]*808v. Alabama, 211 U. S. 452, 453; Matter of Gregory, 219 U. S. 210; Harlan v. McGourin, 218 U. S. 442; Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U. S. 333, 335, 336; Craig v. Hecht, 263 U. S. 255, 277; Goto v. Lane, 265 U. S. 393; Knewel v. Egan, 268 U. S. 442.

Messrs. James H. Brown and M. W. Spaulding for appellant. Messrs. John S. Underwood, Attorney General of Colorado, Colin A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack Garrett Scott, were on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per "Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Bailey [808]*808v. Alabama, 211 U. S. 452, 453; Matter of Gregory, 219 U. S. 210; Harlan v. McGourin, 218 U. S. 442; Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U. S. 333, 335, 336; Craig v. Hecht, 263 U. S. 255, 277; Goto v. Lane, 265 U. S. 393; Knewel v. Egan, 268 U. S. 442.

Messrs. James H. Brown and M. W. Spaulding for appellant. Messrs. John S. Underwood, Attorney General of Colorado, Colin A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack Garrett Scott, were on the brief, for appellee.

Cox v. Colorado, 282 U.S. 807, 51 S. Ct. 103 (1930).

Pincite

282 U.S. 807 (Cox v. Colorado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related