Russo v. Manning

313 S.E.2d 319, 252 Ga. 155, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 639
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1984
Docket40679
StatusPublished
Cited by64 cases

This text of 313 S.E.2d 319 (Russo v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russo v. Manning, 313 S.E.2d 319, 252 Ga. 155, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 639 (Ga. 1984).

Opinion

Marshall, Presiding Justice.

The following appeals must be made by application: “Appeals from judgments or orders granting or refusing a divorce or temporary or permanent alimony, awarding or refusing to change child custody, or holding or declining to hold persons in contempt of such alimony or child custody judgment or orders.” (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(2) (Code Ann. § 6-701.1). Where the underlying subject matter, i.e., the issues sought to be appealed, clearly arises from or is ancillary to divorce proceedings, or is derived from a marital relationship and divorce, the appeal is within the ambit of this statute. Floyd v. Floyd, 250 Ga. 208 (296 SE2d 607) (1982) and cits.; Tobitt v. Tobitt, 249 Ga. 245 (290 SE2d 49) (1982).

*156 Decided February 16, 1984 — Rehearing denied February 28, 1984. Michael Lucio Russo, pro se. Rogers & Brownlow, David R. Rogers, for appellee.

A judgment of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree is appealable only by application for discretionary appeal. Walters v. Walters, 245 Ga. 695 (266 SE2d 507) (1980). In Ensley v. Ensley, 239 Ga. 860 (238 SE2d 920) (1977), we held that a father who wilfully refuses to pay child support required by a divorce decree may be found guilty of contempt of court and unconditionally imprisoned for 20 days pursuant to Code § 24-2615(5) (OCGA § 15-6-8).

Accordingly, this notice of appeal from a judgment of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree (finding violations by harassment, abuse, threats; assaults, annoyánces, and wilful refusal to make house payments as ordered), which judgment imposed a 20-day unconditional imprisonment, must bé dismissed for failure to file an application for appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(2) (Code Ann. § 6-701.1).

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quintez Martin v. Candace Griffith
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Andrea Davis-Brown v. Lawrence Brown, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Peter Edwin Dean v. Elizabeth A. Dean
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
John Carter Rowland Bird v. Maria Elena Bird
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Kashka Scott v. Precious Anderson
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Findlay Clarke v. Excomoria Clarke
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Mimy Ngalula v. Yves Letunita
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Jaamel L. Goins v. Alexis Davis
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Shalaire Johnson v. Brittany Johnson
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Willie G. Davis Jr. v. Yvette A. Davis
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Ronald L. Washington v. Laverne M. Ballard
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
James McClendon v. Christa Roberson
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Willie Arthur Johnson v. Priscilla H. King
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Danny Ray Dunn v. Caryn Alissa Dunn
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Akeno Reid v. Shandi Sutton
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Trevor Williams v. Kyiesha Harris
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Jessica Cannon v. Carlos Cannon
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Miguel A.cossio v. Skye A. Cossio
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 S.E.2d 319, 252 Ga. 155, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-manning-ga-1984.