Miguel A.cossio v. Skye A. Cossio

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 1, 2024
DocketA25A0539
StatusPublished

This text of Miguel A.cossio v. Skye A. Cossio (Miguel A.cossio v. Skye A. Cossio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miguel A.cossio v. Skye A. Cossio, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 01, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0539. MIGUEL A. COSSIO v. SKYE A. COSSIO.

Miguel A. Cossio and Skye A. Cossio divorced on February 15, 2023. The wife later filed a motion for citation of contempt and for attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation. The trial court granted the wife’s motion, holding the husband in contempt for failure to pay child support, alimony and other expenses and ordered him incarcerated until he purged the contempt. The husband filed a notice of appeal therefrom, seeking to challenge the divorce decree, the denial of his motion for new trial, and the order holding him in contempt. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Appeals from “judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” including orders “holding or declining to hold persons in contempt” of such orders must be made by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). Here, to challenge the order finding him in contempt of his divorce decree or the subsequent incarceration order, the husband was required to file an application for discretionary appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2); Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga. 155, 155-156 (312 SE2d 319) (1984) (holding that order finding party in contempt of divorce decree and ordering him incarcerated was appealable only by application for discretionary appeal). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). The husband’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/01/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russo v. Manning
313 S.E.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1984)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miguel A.cossio v. Skye A. Cossio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miguel-acossio-v-skye-a-cossio-gactapp-2024.