Kashka Scott v. Precious Anderson
This text of Kashka Scott v. Precious Anderson (Kashka Scott v. Precious Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ October 31, 2025
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A0687. KASHKA SCOTT v. PRECIOUS ANDERSON.
Kashka Scott filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order holding him in contempt for failure to pay child support and other domestic support obligations. We lack jurisdiction. Appeals from judgments or orders in domestic relations cases, including orders “holding or declining to hold persons in contempt,” must be made by application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(2), (b). See also Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga. 155, 156 (312 SE2d 319) (1984) (“A judgment of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree is appealable only by application for discretionary appeal.”). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Ga., 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021). Accordingly, Scott’s failure to follow the requisite discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/31/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kashka Scott v. Precious Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kashka-scott-v-precious-anderson-gactapp-2025.