Russell v. Tate
Opinion
We affirm the decision of the court of appeals. An appeal rather than a writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy when challeng[445] ing violations of the right to a speedy trial. In re Jackson (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 189, 522 N.E.2d 540.
Moreover, the issue of a violation of appellant’s right to a speedy trial has been previously adjudicated on direct appeal to the Eleventh District Court of Appeals. That court denied appellant’s claim and, therefore, the issue is clearly res judicata. Burch v. Morris (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 18, 25 OBR 15, 494 N.E.2d 1137.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
596 N.E.2d 1039 (Russell v. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.