State Ex Rel. Sadovskiy v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State Ex Rel. Sadovskiy v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999)

DecidedSeptember 29, 1999

DocketNo. 77020.

StatusUnpublished

This text of State Ex Rel. Sadovskiy v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999) (State Ex Rel. Sadovskiy v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Sadovskiy v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999), (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Sua sponte, we dismiss the relator's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A claimed violation of the relator's right to a speedy trial is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Russell v.Mitchell (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 328; State ex rel. Brantley v.Ghee (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287; State ex rel. Brantley v.Anderson (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 446.

An appeal, rather than a writ of habeas corpus, is the appropriate remedy when a defendant in a criminal matter alleges a violation of the right to a speedy trial. State ex rel. Dotsonv. Rogers (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 25; Russell v. Tate (1992),64 Ohio St.3d 444. The defendant, upon appeal, may also apply for a stay of execution of sentence pursuant to App. R. 8 and Loc. App. R. 8.

Accordingly, we dismiss the relator's petition for a writ of habeas corpus for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Civ.R. 12 (B) (6); State ex rel. Peeples v.Anderson (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 559. Costs to relator.

Writ dismissed.

KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., and MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, J., CONCUR.

_____________________________________ TIMOTHY E. McMONAGLE PRESIDING JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI