Russell v. Pappas

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 2014·No. 62677·Unpublished

Opinion

based solely on respondent's alleged violation of various criminal statutes, which are not proper claims for a civil complaint. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

Pickering Pitku tiAp J.

Par

J. Saitta

cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge Russell Demetras & O'Neill Washoe District Court Clerk

'To the extent that appellant has raised other arguments on appeal, we conclude that these arguments do not warrant reversal of the district court's dismissal order.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) (947A e4()

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

based solely on respondent's alleged violation of various criminal statutes, which are not proper claims for a civil complaint. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

Pickering Pitku tiAp J.

Par

J. Saitta

cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge Russell Demetras & O'Neill Washoe District Court Clerk

'To the extent that appellant has raised other arguments on appeal, we conclude that these arguments do not warrant reversal of the district court's dismissal order.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) (947A e4()

Russell v. Pappas, (Neb. 2014).

Pincite

Russell v. Pappas (Russell v. Pappas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.