Russell v. Pappas

Opinion

An unpub|ishdd order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

SuPREME Coum' oF NEvAnA

(O) 1947A

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RUSSELL, No. 6293'7 Appellant, vs. _ a CHRISTINE PAPPAS; AND WASHOE § § L § COUNTY SHERIFF, Respondents. "|UL 1 2 2013

TRAc\E »<, L:NL)EMAN

R z ounr

\Y ' naPuTY cLERx

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration of a procedural order. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Const. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 20'7, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Thus, because we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/l¢-/\'»@»¢i. ,J.

Hardesty \

C erry

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Russell Christine Pappas Washoe County District Attorney/Civil Division Washoe District Court Clerk