Russell v. Pappas
This text of Russell v. Pappas (Russell v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An unpub|ishdd order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
SuPREME Coum' oF NEvAnA
(O) 1947A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RUSSELL, No. 6293'7 Appellant, vs. _ a CHRISTINE PAPPAS; AND WASHOE § § L § COUNTY SHERIFF, Respondents. "|UL 1 2 2013
TRAc\E »<, L:NL)EMAN
R z ounr
\Y ' naPuTY cLERx
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration of a procedural order. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Const. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 20'7, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Thus, because we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
/l¢-/\'»@»¢i. ,J.
Hardesty \
C erry
cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Russell Christine Pappas Washoe County District Attorney/Civil Division Washoe District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Russell v. Pappas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-pappas-nev-2013.