Russell v. Pappas

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 1, 2014·No. 65880·Unpublished

Opinion

An unpub|islled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME C()URT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RUSSELL, No. 65880 Appellant_,

Fll.§ ;

CHRISTINE PAPPAS_, Respondent. AUG g 1 2[]]!¢

T Cl .L!NUE|‘AAN F PREM COURT

DEPUTV CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying his request to amend a district courtsorder granting him in forma pauperis status. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Tczylor C'onsz‘.r. C'o. i). Hilton Hotels C'orp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Accordiiigly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

pettway @J_

Pickei’in g j

rises 0~4.)1 ,J_ = »/1 ,L __ ,J.

Parraguirre s Saitta

_1._

cc; Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Russell Demetras & O’Neill Washoe District Court Clerk

Sur»nems Courrr or NEvAoA

"°’ o /i » 2 iam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. Pappas, (Neb. 2014).

Russell v. Pappas (Russell v. Pappas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
678 P.2d 1152 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)