Russell v. Pappas
Opinion
An unpub|islled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME C()URT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RUSSELL, No. 65880 Appellant_,
Fll.§ ;
CHRISTINE PAPPAS_, Respondent. AUG g 1 2[]]!¢
T Cl .L!NUE|‘AAN F PREM COURT
DEPUTV CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying his request to amend a district courtsorder granting him in forma pauperis status. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Tczylor C'onsz‘.r. C'o. i). Hilton Hotels C'orp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Accordiiigly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
pettway @J_
Pickei’in g j
rises 0~4.)1 ,J_ = »/1 ,L __ ,J.
Parraguirre s Saitta
_1._
cc; Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Russell Demetras & O’Neill Washoe District Court Clerk
Sur»nems Courrr or NEvAoA
"°’ o /i » 2 iam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. Pappas (Russell v. Pappas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.