Russell Lumber & Supply Co. v. Grooms
This text of 21 S.W.2d 832 (Russell Lumber & Supply Co. v. Grooms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
. The Russell Lumber & Supply Company, which we shall call the plaintiff sued Mrs. Alice Grooms for $1,-094.25 for building material it sold Philipps & Simpson, which they used in remodeling a house for her. The court peremptorily directed a verdict for the defendant, and from the judgment which followed plaintiff appeals.
The evidence is that Mrs. Grooms employed Philipps & Simpson to remodel a house for her. They were to do this work and furnish this material for $4,700. Plaintiff sold and charged this material to them. Plaintiff failed to file a lien for this material but sued Mrs. Grooms for the bill.
The peremptory instruction was properly given for two reasons: Plaintiff failed to prove Mrs. Grooms promised to pay for this material sold to Philipps & Simpson, and also failed to allege she made such a promise, thus failing both in its proof and its pleading. To avoid a peremptory instruction a plaintiff must have a cause of action both proven and pleaded. Utterback v. Quick, 230 Ky. 333, 19 S. W. (2d) 980.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 S.W.2d 832, 231 Ky. 544, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-lumber-supply-co-v-grooms-kyctapphigh-1929.