Ruiz v. Board of Levee Commissioners

150 So. 809
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 27, 1933·No. Nos. 13247, 13246, 13389, 13230, 13237, 13238, 13239, 13242, 13243, 13244, 13229, 13228,’ 13227, 13207, 13009·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cases arise as the result of the Caernarvon crevasse which was artificially created in 1927. Each of the above cases involves a claim based on the charge that the claimant was deprived of the ability to earn his livelihood' in his chosen occupation.

In Alfred Oliver & Co. v. Board of Commissioners Orleans Levee District, 169 La. 438, 125 So. 441, the Supreme Court of Louisiana considered a case involving a question identical with that presented in each of the above cases and held that there was no right to recover. See, also, Acosta v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 12 La. App. 488, 126 So. 463; Foret v. Board, 169 La. 427, 125 So. 437; Fabre et al. v. Board, 170 La. 210, 127 So. 603, and Louisiana Southern Railway Company v. Board, 176 La. 687, 146 So. 470.

The judgment appealed from in each of the above cases is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruiz v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 150 So. 809 (La. Ct. App. 1933).

150 So. 809 (Ruiz v. Board of Levee Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alfred Oliver & Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist.
125 So. 441 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1929)
Fabre v. Board of Com'rs
127 So. 603 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
Foret v. Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist.
125 So. 437 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1929)
Acosta v. Board of Commissioners
126 So. 463 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)