Acosta v. Board of Commissioners

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Acosta v. Board of Commissioners

126 So. 463, 12 La. App. 488, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 22

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 17, 1930

DocketNo. 13,039

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 126 So. 463 (Acosta v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acosta v. Board of Commissioners, 126 So. 463, 12 La. App. 488, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 22 (La. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinions

CAGE, J. ad hoc.

The plaintiff sues for commissions and profits that, as a merchant or storekeeper, he was deprived of by the Caernarvon Crevasse and his suit was dismissed by the district court on an exception of no cause of action.

[489]*489From this judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

There is nothing to differentiate the law of this case, from that of Foret vs. Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee Board, No. 30063 of the docket of the Supreme Court, reported in Southern Reporter, Vol. 125, pp. 437, et seq., and Oliver vs. same defendant, No. 30,134 of the docket of the Supreme Court reported in same volume of the Southern Reporter at pages 441, et seq.

For the reasons, given by the Supreme Court in these two cases, we consider the judgment of the district court to be correct, and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI