Rue v. Quinn

66 P. 216, 137 Cal. 651, 1902 Cal. LEXIS 627
California Supreme Court·Decided November 19, 1902·No. L.A. No. 839.·Published·Cited by 52 cases

Opinions

Upon further consideration of this cause, after hearing in Bank, we are satisfied with the conclusion reached by Department One in its opinion filed September 24, 1901, and for the reasons stated in said opinion the order is reversed.

Harrison, J., Van Dyke, J., McFarland, J., and Henshaw, J., concurred.

The following is the opinion rendered in Department One, above referred to: —

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rue v. Quinn, 66 P. 216, 137 Cal. 651, 1902 Cal. LEXIS 627 (Cal. 1902).

66 P. 216 (Rue v. Quinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia v. Garcia
Superior Court of Guam, 2013
Pugh v. Pugh
Superior Court of Guam, 2012
R.K. Inc. v. Smart Hand International
Superior Court of Guam, 2012
Tolentino v. Tolentino
Superior Court of Guam, 2012
Rivera v. Rivera
Superior Court of Guam, 2012
Mansor, Jr. v. Mansor
Superior Court of Guam, 2012
Mitchell v. Mitchell
Superior Court of Guam, 2012
Kott v. Superior Court
45 Cal. App. 4th 1126 (California Court of Appeal, 1996)
Watts v. Crawford
896 P.2d 807 (California Supreme Court, 1995)
Quaranta v. Merlini
192 Cal. App. 3d 22 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
Hirsch v. Blish
76 Cal. App. 3d 163 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
Cradduck v. Financial Indemnity Co.
242 Cal. App. 2d 850 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
Mundo v. Fuster
87 P.R. 343 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1963)
Miller v. Superior Court
195 Cal. App. 2d 779 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. Preston
329 P.2d 489 (California Supreme Court, 1958)
Kidd v. Rasmus
285 S.W.2d 415 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
People v. 632 Square Meters of Land
74 P.R. 897 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1953)
Pueblo v. 632 Metros Cuadrados de Terreno
74 P.R. Dec. 961 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1953)