Ruben v. Ruben
This text of 488 So. 2d 573 (Ruben v. Ruben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The wife appeals a final judgment of dissolution. She challenges the denial of attorney’s fees, award of rehabilitative rather than permanent alimony, the amount of rehabilitative alimony, and the denial of child support for the wife’s daughter from a previous marriage. In light of the husband’s superior financial position, and in order to avoid a diminution of the wife’s assets, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to award the wife attorney’s fees. See Cana-[574]*574karis v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1204-05 (Fla.1980); Kane v. Kane, 469 So.2d 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Jacobs v. Jacobs, 429 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The remaining points lack merit.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 So. 2d 573, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 997, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruben-v-ruben-fladistctapp-1986.