Jacobs v. Jacobs

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jacobs v. Jacobs

429 So. 2d 1285, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20789

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 1983

DocketNos. 82-596, 82-1384

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 429 So. 2d 1285 (Jacobs v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobs v. Jacobs, 429 So. 2d 1285, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20789 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution alleging several errors on the part of the trial court.

With the exception of the wife’s attorneys’ fees, which should have been charged entirely to the husband due to his superior financial position, Locke v. Locke, 413 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hudgens v. Hudgens, 411 So.2d 354 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Johnson v. Johnson, 403 So.2d 1388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), we find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion with respect to any of the issues raised. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed with directions that the husband be responsible for the entire $10,000 attorneys’ fee award to the wife. The judgment under review is otherwise entirely affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution alleging several errors on the part of the trial court.

With the exception of the wife’s attorneys’ fees, which should have been charged entirely to the husband due to his superior financial position, Locke v. Locke, 413 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hudgens v. Hudgens, 411 So.2d 354 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Johnson v. Johnson, 403 So.2d 1388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), we find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion with respect to any of the issues raised. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed with directions that the husband be responsible for the entire $10,000 attorneys’ fee award to the wife. The judgment under review is otherwise entirely affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 So. 2d 1285, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-jacobs-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack