Kane v. Kane
This text of 469 So. 2d 933 (Kane v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Phillip KANE, Appellant,
v.
Shirley KANE, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mark E. Pollack, Miami, for appellant.
Cohen, Brown, Reed, Ivans & Schwartz and Allen Reed, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal and cross-appeal, we find no abuse of discretion with regard to any of the issues raised, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980), except for the award of attorney's fees, which should have been assessed entirely against the husband in view of his superior financial position. Hirst v. Hirst, 452 So.2d 1083, 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Jacobs v. Jacobs, 429 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the award of attorney's fees is reversed. The final judgment is in all other respects affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 So. 2d 933, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kane-v-kane-fladistctapp-1985.