Roy v. State
This text of 90 S.W.3d 720 (Roy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
The opinion was delivered
Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and the Court of Appeals affirmed.1 We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the warrantless search and seizure of appellant was reasonable. After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the relevant portions of the record, and after hearing argument on the case, we conclude that our decision to grant the petition was improvident. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review.2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 S.W.3d 720, 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212, 2002 WL 31470072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-v-state-texcrimapp-2002.