Roy v. State

90 S.W.3d 720, 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212, 2002 WL 31470072

Opinions

OPINION

The opinion was delivered

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and the Court of Appeals affirmed.¹ We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the warrantless search and seizure of appellant was reasonable. After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the relevant portions of the record, and after hearing argument on the case, we conclude that our decision to grant the petition was improvident. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review.²

HOLCOMB, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which PRICE, J., joined. MEYERS, J., dissented.

Footnotes

1

. Roy v. State, 55 S.W.3d 153 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2001).

2

. See Tex.R.App. P. 69.3.