Rottenberg v. Clarke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rottenberg v. Clarke

144 A.D.3d 1628, 40 N.Y.S.3d 809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.3d 1628 (Rottenberg v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rottenberg v. Clarke, 144 A.D.3d 1628, 40 N.Y.S.3d 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered March 13, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order restrained respondent from injurious actions with respect to the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Rottenberg v Clarke ([appeal No. 1] 144 AD3d 1627 [2016]).

Present—Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, DeJoseph and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered March 13, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order restrained respondent from injurious actions with respect to the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Rottenberg v Clarke ([appeal No. 1] 144 AD3d 1627 [2016]).

Present—Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, DeJoseph and Scudder, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.3d 1628, 40 N.Y.S.3d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rottenberg-v-clarke-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack