Matter of Townsend v. Myers

2025 NY Slip Op 02450
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 25, 2025
Docket149 CAF 24-00247
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02450 (Matter of Townsend v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Townsend v. Myers, 2025 NY Slip Op 02450 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Matter of Townsend v Myers (2025 NY Slip Op 02450)
Matter of Townsend v Myers
2025 NY Slip Op 02450
Decided on April 25, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, OGDEN, NOWAK, AND KEANE, JJ.

149 CAF 24-00247

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF PATRICIA TOWNSEND, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

GREGORY MYERS, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND ASHLEY MYERS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


THOMAS L. PELYCH, HORNELL, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

WALTER BURKARD, MANLIUS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Christina F. DeJoseph, J.), entered October 24, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, granted petitioner sole legal and physical custody with respect to the subject child.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, respondent father appeals from an order effectively granting, on the father's default, the petition of the subject child's maternal aunt seeking sole custody of the child. Because neither the father nor his attorney appeared at the custody hearing, Family Court deemed the father to be in default (see generally Matter of Malachi S. [Michael W.], 195 AD3d 1445, 1446 [4th Dept 2021], lv dismissed 37 NY3d 1081 [2021]). " '[I]t is well settled that no appeal lies from an order that is entered upon the default of the appealing party' " (Matter of Roache v Hughes-Roache, 153 AD3d 1653, 1653 [4th Dept 2017]; see Matter of Rottenberg v Clarke, 144 AD3d 1627, 1627 [4th Dept 2016]). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Entered: April 25, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Roache v. Hughes-Roache
2017 NY Slip Op 6809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Rottenberg v. Clarke
144 A.D.3d 1627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 02450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-townsend-v-myers-nyappdiv-2025.