Roshni v. Patel v. Kensington Community Association, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roshni v. Patel v. Kensington Community Association, Inc.

DecidedMay 11, 2018

DocketA18A1577

StatusPublished

This text of Roshni v. Patel v. Kensington Community Association, Inc. (Roshni v. Patel v. Kensington Community Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roshni v. Patel v. Kensington Community Association, Inc., (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 10, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1577. ROSHNI V. PATEL v. KENSINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.

In April 2015, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Kensington Community Association, Inc. and against Roshni V. Patel for unpaid homeowners’ association fees. Patel appealed and this Court affirmed the judgment. Patel v. Kensington Community Assn, 340 Ga. App. 896 (797 SE2d 235) (2017). In June 2017, Patel filed a motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60. The trial court denied the motion to set aside and granted Kensington OCGA § 9-15- 14 attorney fees. Patel then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “[T]he denial of a motion to set aside a final judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 is not directly appealable and instead requires the filing of an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b).” Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006); see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). Furthermore, an appeal from a trial court order awarding OCGA § 9-15-14 attorney fees must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10), (b); Capricorn Systems, Inc. v. Godavarthy, 253 Ga. App. 840, 841- 842 (560 SE2d 730) (2002). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Patel’s failure to follow the discretionary review procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/10/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 10, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1577. ROSHNI V. PATEL v. KENSINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.

In April 2015, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Kensington Community Association, Inc. and against Roshni V. Patel for unpaid homeowners’ association fees. Patel appealed and this Court affirmed the judgment. Patel v. Kensington Community Assn, 340 Ga. App. 896 (797 SE2d 235) (2017). In June 2017, Patel filed a motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60. The trial court denied the motion to set aside and granted Kensington OCGA § 9-15- 14 attorney fees. Patel then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “[T]he denial of a motion to set aside a final judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 is not directly appealable and instead requires the filing of an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b).” Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006); see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). Furthermore, an appeal from a trial court order awarding OCGA § 9-15-14 attorney fees must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10), (b); Capricorn Systems, Inc. v. Godavarthy, 253 Ga. App. 840, 841- 842 (560 SE2d 730) (2002). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Patel’s failure to follow the discretionary review procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/10/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Roshni v. Patel v. Kensington Community Association, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roshni-v-patel-v-kensington-community-association-inc-gactapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack