Rosenberg v. Pubnico Realty Corp.

258 A.D. 1090, 18 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order granting motion to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute modified by striking therefrom the words “ unless the plaintiff causes the ease to be placed on the calendar for the December, 1939, term of this court for trial, and pays the sum of Ten Dollars ($10) costs to the defendant;” and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. (Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp., 256 App. Div. 833; Gellman v. Coulawtas, 253 id. 910; Wheeler v. Duell, 230 id. 392.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor .tod Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenberg v. Pubnico Realty Corp., 258 A.D. 1090, 18 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

258 A.D. 1090 (Rosenberg v. Pubnico Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fass v. Greenbaum
22 Misc. 2d 112 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Granich v. Stolovitz
270 A.D. 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Morton v. City of New York
260 A.D. 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)