Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp.
This text of 256 A.D. 833 (Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying, conditionally, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The delay of well over two years after joinder of issue, during which time the cause of action was not noticed for trial, with no reasonable excuse offered for the delay, requires dismissal. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 833, 9 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farber-v-broadco-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1939.