Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp.
256 A.D. 833, 9 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5072
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1939·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Order denying, conditionally, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The delay of well over two years after joinder of issue, during which time the cause of action was not noticed for trial, with no reasonable excuse offered for the delay, requires dismissal. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp., 256 A.D. 833, 9 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
256 A.D. 833 (Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kronish v. Seagate Garage, Inc.
16 A.D.2d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Fass v. Greenbaum
22 Misc. 2d 112 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Vitale v. Bartlucci
7 Misc. 2d 7 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.
204 Misc. 740 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.
115 F.2d 406 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Rosenberg v. Pubnico Realty Corp.
258 A.D. 1090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)