Morton v. City of New York
This text of 260 A.D. 867 (Morton v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Order granting conditionally appellant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute modified by striking from the order everything following the word “ granted.” As thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No sufficient excuse for the delay of more than three years after joinder of issue was given, and the motion should have been granted unconditionally. (Rosenberg v. Pubnico Realty Corp., 258 App. Div. 1090.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 867, 22 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1940.