Rosemond v. State

634 So. 2d 259, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2869, 1994 WL 101030
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 30, 1994
DocketNo. 93-673
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 634 So. 2d 259 (Rosemond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosemond v. State, 634 So. 2d 259, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2869, 1994 WL 101030 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Rosemond challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We conclude that the trial court’s summary denial of the four ineffective assistance of counsel claims on the basis of their involving tactical decisions was erroneous. The order is deficient because it recites no basis upon which the trial court determined that the actions of trial counsel were tactical and because it does not have attached those portions of the record that support such a finding. Fla.R.Crim.Pro. 3.850(d); Williams v. State, 601 So.2d 596, 598-99 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); see Boutwell v. State, 563 So.2d 798, 799 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Moreover, the determination of whether defense counsel’s actions were tactical is a conclusion best made by the trial judge following an eviden-tiary hearing. Davis v. State, 608 So.2d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Harley v. State, 594 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial of the ineffective assistance of counsel claims and remand with directions that the trial court either hold an evidentiary hearing or again deny the motion and attach portions of the record conclusively showing that Rosemond would be entitled to no relief on those claims. Davis, 608 So.2d at 540. We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Rosemond’s remaining claim because it could or should have been raised on direct appeal. See Chandler v. Dugger, 634 So.2d 1066 (Fla.1994).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. BOOTH, J., concurs and dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
127 So. 3d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Greenway v. State
823 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Jackson v. State
789 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Rogers v. State
652 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 So. 2d 259, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2869, 1994 WL 101030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosemond-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.