Rosemond v. State
578 So. 2d 875, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4406, 1991 WL 68895
This text of 578 So. 2d 875 (Rosemond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rosemond v. State, 578 So. 2d 875, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4406, 1991 WL 68895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
We affirm the conviction and sentence in this case, but strike that portion of the judgment which requires appellant to pay court costs and attorney fees. Appellant was not given notice that such costs would be imposed. The state may seek reimposition of the costs after proper notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
578 So. 2d 875, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4406, 1991 WL 68895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosemond-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.