Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rosemond v. State

Rosemond v. State

578 So. 2d 875, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4406, 1991 WL 68895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosemond v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2869 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 1991·No. No. 90-03306·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction and sentence in this case, but strike that portion of the judgment which requires appellant to pay court costs and attorney fees. Appellant was not given notice that such costs would be imposed. The state may seek reimposition of the costs after proper notice.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosemond v. State, 578 So. 2d 875, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4406, 1991 WL 68895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

578 So. 2d 875 (Rosemond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.