Home/Supreme Court/Rose v. United States

Rose v. United States

476 U.S. 1169, 106 S. Ct. 2889, 90 L. Ed. 2d 977, 54 U.S.L.W. 3809, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 1629
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 9, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1382
StatusPublished
Cited by85 cases

This text of 476 U.S. 1169 (Rose v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. United States, 476 U.S. 1169, 106 S. Ct. 2889, 90 L. Ed. 2d 977, 54 U.S.L.W. 3809, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 1629 (1986).

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the State
202 P.3d 1226 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2009)
Kahoohanohano v. State
162 P.3d 696 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2007)
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
163 F.3d 341 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Mark A. Simon
85 F.3d 906 (Second Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Julius Klausner
80 F.3d 55 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Smoky Mountain Secrets, Inc. v. United States
910 F. Supp. 1316 (E.D. Tennessee, 1995)
Miravalle v. Commissioner
105 T.C. No. 5 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia Bell Atlantic Video Services Company Bell Atlantic Corporation Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company C & P Telephone Company of Maryland the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of West Virginia the Diamond State Telephone Company the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. United States of America Federal Communications Commission Janet Reno, in Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and the National Cable Television Association, Incorporated, Consumer Federation of America Virginia Citizens Consumer Council Newspaper Association of America Virginia Press Association Computer & Communications Industry Association Mets Fans United/virginia Consumers for Cable Choice Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation the American Legislative Exchange Council the Competitive Enterprise Institute the United States Telephone Association Ameritech Corporation Bellsouth Corporation Gte Service Corporation, on Behalf of Its Affiliated Domestic Operating Companies Nynex Corporation Pacific Telesis Group Rochester Telephone Corporation Southwestern Bell Corporation Us West Incorporated Telecommunications Industry Association, Fiber Optics Division, Amici Curiae. The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia Bell Atlantic Corporation Bell Atlantic Video Services Company Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of West Virginia the Diamond State Telephone Company the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. The National Cable Television Association, Incorporated, and United States of America Federal Communications Commission Janet Reno, in Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Consumer Federation of America Virginia Citizens Consumer Council Newspaper Association of America Virginia Press Association Computer & Communications Industry Association Mets Fans United/virginia Consumers for Cable Choice Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation the American Legislative Exchange Council the Competitive Enterprise Institute the United States Telephone Association Ameritech Corporation Bellsouth Corporation Gte Service Corporation, on Behalf of Its Affiliated Domestic Operating Companies Nynex Corporation Pacific Telesis Group Rochester Telephone Corporation Southwestern Bell Corporation Us West Incorporated Telecommunications Industry Association, Fiber Optics Division, Amici Curiae
42 F.3d 181 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. United States
42 F.3d 181 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Haas v. Internal Revenue Service
31 F.3d 1081 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Daniels Cablevision, Inc. v. United States
835 F. Supp. 1 (District of Columbia, 1993)
Baehr v. Lewin
852 P.2d 44 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1993)
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
819 F. Supp. 32 (District of Columbia, 1993)
Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission
810 F. Supp. 1302 (District of Columbia, 1992)
Brightwell v. United States
805 F. Supp. 1464 (S.D. Indiana, 1992)
United States v. Harris
805 F. Supp. 166 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Sunbelt Television, Inc. v. Jones Intercable, Inc.
795 F. Supp. 333 (C.D. California, 1992)
Beach Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
959 F.2d 975 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
John E. Tompkins, as of the Last Will and Testament of Steven M. Tompkins, Deceased v. The United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
946 F.2d 817 (Eleventh Circuit, 1991)
Cox Cable Communications, Inc. v. United States
774 F. Supp. 633 (M.D. Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 U.S. 1169, 106 S. Ct. 2889, 90 L. Ed. 2d 977, 54 U.S.L.W. 3809, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 1629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-united-states-scotus-1986.