Rosa v. Administration for Children's Services (ACS)

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-07304
StatusUnknown

This text of Rosa v. Administration for Children's Services (ACS) (Rosa v. Administration for Children's Services (ACS)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosa v. Administration for Children's Services (ACS), (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FELICIA ROSA, Plaintiff, 24-CV-7304 (LTS) -against- ORDER ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. She brings this suit against the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (ACS), ACS case workers, and numerous entities outside this district, including the State of New Jersey, the City of Paterson, New Jersey, the Paterson Housing Authority, the Albany Housing Authority, and Albany County. She asserts claims which appear to have arisen beginning in 2018. Plaintiff asks the Court for leave to amend her complaint (ECF 4.) DISCUSSION Under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff has the right to amend the complaint once, without permission of the court, within a certain time frame after service of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). No summonses have issued, and thus proper service has not been effected. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to amend her complaint once, without a court order. An amended complaint form is attached to this order. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff must provide a short and plain statement explaining what each defendant did or failed to do that violated her rights. If Plaintiff has an address for any named defendant, Plaintiff must provide it. Plaintiff should include: a) the names and titles of all relevant people; b) a description of all relevant events, including what each defendant did or failed to do, the approximate date and time of each event, and the general location where each event occurred; c) a description of the injuries Plaintiff suffered; and d) the relief Plaintiff seeks, such as money damages, injunctive relief, or declaratory relief. Essentially, Plaintiff’s amended complaint should tell the Court: who violated her federally protected rights; how, when, and where such violations occurred; and why Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Plaintiff’s amended complaint will completely replace, not supplement, the original complaint. The Court further notes that “[u]nrelated claims against different defendants belong in different suits . . . “ Webb v. Maldanado, No. 13-CV-144 (RNC), 2013 WL 3243135, at *3 (D. Conn. June 26, 2013); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 18, 21. Moreover, if Plaintiff is asserting claims that may be time-barred, Plaintiff should include any allegations showing a basis for tolling the limitations period.1 The Court encourages Plaintiff, before filing an amended complaint, to contact the SDNY Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project, which is operated by the City Bar Justice Center (CBJC). The SDNY Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project assists self-represented parties with civil cases in this court. Appointments can be scheduled by phone (212-382-4794), email (fedprosdny@nycbar.org), or by completing the intake form. A flyer with details is attached.2

1 In New York, the statute of limitations for a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is three years. See Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989); N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5). 2 The CBJC is a private organization that it not part of the court, and the CBJC’s SDNY Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project cannot accept filings on behalf of the court. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within 30 days, or request an extension of time to do so, the Court will treat the original complaint as the operative complaint and screen it, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), for deficiencies. CONCLUSION Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint is moot because, under Rule 15

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, she is entitled at this stage to file an amended complaint without leave of court. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court’s Pro Se Intake Unit within 30 days of the date of this order, caption the document as an “Amended Complaint,” and label the document with docket number 24-CV-7304 (LTS). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Court will treat the original complaint as the operative complaint and screen it, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), for deficiencies. Plaintiff may consent to accept service of documents in this case by email, instead of regular mail, by completing the attached form, Consent to Electronic Service.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 13, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CVE TT a (clu ber if has b Write the full name of each plaintiff. evened) me eNews

against AMENDED

□ COMPLAINT ee Do you want a jury trial? LlYes ULINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you need more space, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section Il.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev. 2/10/17

I. BASIS FOR JURISDICTION Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction (limited power). Generally, only two types of cases can be heard in federal court: cases involving a federal question and cases involving diversity of citizenship of the parties. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, a case arising under the United States Constitution or federal laws or treaties is a federal question case. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Owens v. Okure
488 U.S. 235 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosa v. Administration for Children's Services (ACS), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-v-administration-for-childrens-services-acs-nysd-2025.