Roldan v. State
This text of 695 So. 2d 864 (Roldan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael E. ROLDAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Michael E. Roldan, Moore Haven, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Richardson v. State, 677 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) and cases cited therein and Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985).
KLEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 So. 2d 864, 1997 WL 330550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roldan-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.