Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Roldan v. State

Roldan v. State

695 So. 2d 864, 1997 WL 330550
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1997·No. 97-1369·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

695 So.2d 864 (1997)

Michael E. ROLDAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-1369.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 18, 1997.

Michael E. Roldan, Moore Haven, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Richardson v. State, 677 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) and cases cited therein and Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985).

KLEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roldan v. State, 695 So. 2d 864, 1997 WL 330550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

695 So. 2d 864 (Roldan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poisal v. State
876 So. 2d 1262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Grogin v. State
824 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Miller v. State
724 So. 2d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Napier v. State
707 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)