Grogin v. State
824 So. 2d 984, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12012, 2002 WL 1906500
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 2002·No. No. 4D01-5079·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. Appellant filed a rule 3.850 motion alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the sentence he would receive in connection with his open plea. The motion is legally insufficient because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); Roldan v. State, 695 So.2d 864, 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grogin v. State, 824 So. 2d 984, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12012, 2002 WL 1906500 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
824 So. 2d 984 (Grogin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saintiler v. State
109 So. 3d 303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)