Napier v. State

707 So. 2d 425, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3170, 1998 WL 145231
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 1998·No. No. 97-4146·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Roldan v. State, 695 So.2d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); and Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Napier v. State, 707 So. 2d 425, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3170, 1998 WL 145231 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

707 So. 2d 425 (Napier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Roldan v. State
695 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)