Napier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Napier v. State

707 So. 2d 425, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3170, 1998 WL 145231

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 1, 1998

DocketNo. 97-4146

StatusPublished

This text of 707 So. 2d 425 (Napier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napier v. State, 707 So. 2d 425, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3170, 1998 WL 145231 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Roldan v. State, 695 So.2d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); and Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Roldan v. State, 695 So.2d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); and Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 So. 2d 425, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3170, 1998 WL 145231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napier-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack