Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 896, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1530

United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1966·No. No. P66/19; protests 65/7231 and 65/7232 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of instruments in chief value of metal having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., [897]*897Arrows Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of instruments in chief value of metal having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., [897]*897Arrows Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 896, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1530 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

56 Cust. Ct. 896 (Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.