Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 896, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1530

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 5, 1966

DocketNo. P66/19; protests 65/7231 and 65/7232 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 896 (Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 896, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1530 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of instruments in chief value of metal having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., [897]*897Arrows Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of instruments in chief value of metal having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., [897]*897Arrows Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Cust. Ct. 896, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rohde-schwarz-sales-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.