Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 326, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3700

United States Customs Court·Decided June 12, 1963·No. No. 67809; protests 62/8989 and 62/13254 (New York)·Published

Opinion

[327]*327Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of instruments having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[327]*327Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of instruments having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 326, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3700 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

50 Cust. Ct. 326 (Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.