Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 521, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1513

United States Customs Court·Decided December 20, 1965·No. No. 69700; protest 64/17947 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of instruments in chief value of metal having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not voltage, the same in all material respects as those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of instruments in chief value of metal having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not voltage, the same in all material respects as those the subject of United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 521, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1513 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

55 Cust. Ct. 521 (Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.