Rogoff Vs. Marsh

470 P.3d 215
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 24, 2020·No. 81616·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARLENE ROGOFF, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 81616 Appellant, vs. JIM MARSH, AN INDIVIDUAL, FILED Respondent. AUG 21, 2020 BkowF4 ftEMECour ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL U CLEFtK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order directing appellant to execute an IRS authorization, compelling the IRS to release accurate copies of appellant's 2016-2019 tax returns, reserving ruling on a motion for fees and costs, and granting a request for a prove-up hearing regarding darnages. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge. This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or

court rule." See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the aforementioned order. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

—c:LC42446 Parraguirre .mm"

tER,4:1

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A clap zo- 3/O6c) ; ::• "2. -- cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Marlene Rogoff The Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

'CR 1987A ADE. 2 - '•

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogoff Vs. Marsh, 470 P.3d 215 (Neb. 2020).

470 P.3d 215 (Rogoff Vs. Marsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)