Rogoff Vs. Marsh

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARLENE ROGOFF, No. 80830 Appellant, VS. JAMES MARSH, Respondent. FILED

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order granting respondent's motion for disclosure of non-public information. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge. Review of the documents presented with the notice of appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. See NRAP 3A. No statute or court rule allows an appeal from an order granting a motion for disclosure of non-public information. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). An appeal may be taken from a special order which affects rights of a party to the action which grow out of the judgment previously entered and are incorporated in the judgment. See Peck v. Crouser, 129 Nev. 120, 123, 295 P.3d 586, 587-588 (2013). Here, appellant, does not appear to be appealing from a district court order that affects rights growing

SUPREME COURT 09 NEVADA

(0) I947A 4§0. t3r-ri 1 out of, or incorporated in the previous judgment. See NRAP 4(a).

Accordingly we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

/ Hardesty

Cadish

cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge Marlene Rogoff The Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

(0) 1947A 40). 2

L11301