Rogoff Vs. Marsh

469 P.3d 186

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARLENE ROGOFF, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 81615 Appellant,

JAMES MARSH, VS. RILED Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order revising vexatious litigant restrictions in a previous order. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order designating a party a vexatious litigant or revising those restrictions. This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Al4" ,J Stiglich Silver

20 - 3o1S-2._ cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge Marlene Rogoff The Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

( 01 19.17A 2