Rogers-Farmer Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Barnett

188 S.E.2d 122, 125 Ga. App. 494, 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 792, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1384
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 25, 1972
Docket46607
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 188 S.E.2d 122 (Rogers-Farmer Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers-Farmer Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Barnett, 188 S.E.2d 122, 125 Ga. App. 494, 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 792, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1384 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinions

Pannell, Judge.

Under the undisputed facts shown on motion for summary judgment, this case is controlled adversely to the appellee by the decisions in Holbrook v. Capital Auto. Co., 111 Ga. App. 601 (142 SE2d 288); Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 727, 731 (16 SE2d 176); Butts v. Groover, 66 Ga. App. 20 (16 SE2d 894). The purchase order, signed by appellee, after the alleged fraudulent misrepresentation as to mileage was made, reads in part as follows: "Buyer acknowledges he has read and received a printed copy of this order comprising the entire agreement affecting this purchase. . . No warranties, expressed or implied, are made by the dealer with respect to used motor vehicles or motor vehicle chassis furnished hereunder except as may be expressed in writing by the dealer for such motor vehicle or motor vehicle chassis, which warranty, so expressed in writing, is incorporated herein and made a part hereof. . . In case the vehicle covered by this order is a used vehicle, no warranty or representation is made as to the extent vehicle has been used, regardless of the mileage shown on the speedometer of said used vehicle.”

Accordingly, the denial of the summary judgment for the defendant appellant must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Hall, P. J., Eberhardt, Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur. Bell, C. J., Jordan, P. J., Deen and Evans, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jain v. Carload Delivery Service, Inc.
375 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Bill Spreen Toyota, Inc. v. Jenquin
294 S.E.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc. v. Clayton Electric Co.
231 S.E.2d 478 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Kot v. Richard P. Rita Personnel System International, Inc.
214 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
City Dodge, Inc. v. Gardner
208 S.E.2d 794 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
City Dodge, Inc. v. Gardner
203 S.E.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement
195 S.E.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Rogers-Farmer Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Barnett
188 S.E.2d 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.E.2d 122, 125 Ga. App. 494, 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 792, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-farmer-metro-chrysler-plymouth-inc-v-barnett-gactapp-1972.