Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement
Opinion
Defendant in an action for fraudulent misrepresentation appeals from the judgment and from the denial of its motion for a new trial.
The alleged fraudulent misrepresentations occurred when the plaintiff was negotiating for the purchase of a used car with the defendant’s salesman and concerned the condition of that car. As plaintiff signed a contract which contains a disclaimer of any warranties except those expressed in writing, the plaintiff is precluded from recovery under the authority of Rogers-Farmer Metro Chrysler-Plymouth v. Bartlett, 125 Ga. App. 494 (188 SE2d 122).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
195 S.E.2d 249 (Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.