Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement

195 S.E.2d 249, 127 Ga. App. 745, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1011

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 21, 1972

Docket47617

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 S.E.2d 249 (Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews Motors Co. v. Clement, 195 S.E.2d 249, 127 Ga. App. 745, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1011 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant in an action for fraudulent misrepresentation appeals from the judgment and from the denial of its motion for a new trial.

The alleged fraudulent misrepresentations occurred when the plaintiff was negotiating for the purchase of a used car with the defendant’s salesman and concerned the condition of that car. As plaintiff signed a contract which contains a disclaimer of any warranties except those expressed in writing, the plaintiff is precluded from recovery under the authority of Rogers-Farmer Metro Chrysler-Plymouth v. Bartlett, 125 Ga. App. 494 (188 SE2d 122).

Judgment reversed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI