Rodriguez v. Young America Corp.

717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11995, 1998 WL 646658
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 1998·No. No. 98-147·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellants seek review of an order setting aside the entry of a default as opposed to a default judgment, we sua sponte dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Collins v. Penske Truck Leasing, 668 So.2d 343, 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); M & M Aircraft Sens., Inc. v. J.D. Valenciana de Aviacion, Inc., 644 So.2d 548, 548-49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Picardi v. (Flota Vene-zolana) De Mar Rio Y Lago, 555 So.2d 1301, 1302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Broward Employment and Training Admin, v. Community Partnership Program, Inc., 422 So.2d 1101, 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Weislander v. City of Sunrise, 399 So.2d 80, 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Praet v. Martinez, 367 So.2d 657, 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Young America Corp., 717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11995, 1998 WL 646658 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

717 So. 2d 621 (Rodriguez v. Young America Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WENDALL HALL v. CAPTAIN BUSH
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Hall v. Reynolds
268 So. 3d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Medeiros v. Firth
200 So. 3d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Pannell v. Triangle/Oaks Ltd. Partnership
783 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)