Pannell v. Triangle/Oaks Ltd. Partnership

783 So. 2d 325, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4706, 2001 WL 345238
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 2001·No. No. 1D00-5059·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pannell seeks review of a non-final order vacating a default (not a default judgment) entered by the trial court. The order of which Pannell seeks review is not an ap-pealable non-final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. E.g., Rodriguez v. Young America Corp., 717 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (citing numerous cases). See also Philip J. Pado-vano, Florida Appellate Practice § 22.16, at 431-32 (2d ed.1997). Because Pannell candidly “concedes she cannot show a departure from the essential requirements of law under the certiorari standard,” we decline to treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of certiorari. The appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pannell v. Triangle/Oaks Ltd. Partnership, 783 So. 2d 325, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4706, 2001 WL 345238 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

783 So. 2d 325 (Pannell v. Triangle/Oaks Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Young America Corp.
717 So. 2d 621 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)