M & M Aircraft Services, Inc. v. J.D. Valenciana De Aviacion, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

M & M Aircraft Services, Inc. v. J.D. Valenciana De Aviacion, Inc.

644 So. 2d 548, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9462, 1994 WL 535071

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 1994

DocketNo. 94-1513

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 644 So. 2d 548 (M & M Aircraft Services, Inc. v. J.D. Valenciana De Aviacion, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M & M Aircraft Services, Inc. v. J.D. Valenciana De Aviacion, Inc., 644 So. 2d 548, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9462, 1994 WL 535071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the substance of the order under review is an order setting aside a default (not a default judgment), the appeal is dismissed for want of an appealable order. Doctor’s [549]*549Hosp. of Hollywood, Inc. v. Madison, 411 So.2d 190, 192 (Fla.1982); Picardi v. De Mar Rio y Lago, 555 So.2d 1301, 1302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Broward Employment & Training Admin. v. Community Partnership Program, Inc., 422 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Yates v. Roller Skating Rinks, Inc., 379 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Security Motors, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of N. Amer., Inc., 373 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Praet v. Martinez, 367 So.2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Liebman v. Sportatorium, Inc., 374 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Because there is an adequate remedy by appeal at the conclusion of the case, certiorari is denied. See Liebman, 374 So.2d at 1124; see also Broward Employment & Training Admin., 422 So.2d at 1101; Yates, 379 So.2d at 1334; Praet, 367 So.2d at 658 n. 1.

Appeal dismissed; certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As the substance of the order under review is an order setting aside a default (not a default judgment), the appeal is dismissed for want of an appealable order. Doctor’s [549]*549Hosp. of Hollywood, Inc. v. Madison, 411 So.2d 190, 192 (Fla.1982); Picardi v. De Mar Rio y Lago, 555 So.2d 1301, 1302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Broward Employment & Training Admin. v. Community Partnership Program, Inc., 422 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Yates v. Roller Skating Rinks, Inc., 379 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Security Motors, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of N. Amer., Inc., 373 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Praet v. Martinez, 367 So.2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Liebman v. Sportatorium, Inc., 374 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Because there is an adequate remedy by appeal at the conclusion of the case, certiorari is denied. See Liebman, 374 So.2d at 1124; see also Broward Employment & Training Admin., 422 So.2d at 1101; Yates, 379 So.2d at 1334; Praet, 367 So.2d at 658 n. 1.

Appeal dismissed; certiorari denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

644 So. 2d 548, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9462, 1994 WL 535071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-m-aircraft-services-inc-v-jd-valenciana-de-aviacion-inc-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack